patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Inver Grove Heights Council Debates Urban Chicken Ordinance

Should the city allow residents to raise chickens in urban areas? That's the question facing members of the Inver Grove Heights City Council.

 

Does a coopful of chickens in an urban area constitute a public nuisance?

That was the question at the core of a debate between members of the Inver Grove Heights City Council on Monday night, as they considered a new ordinance allowing local residents to raise chickens within residential neighborhoods in the city.

City regulations currently prohibits residents from raising chickens—and other farm or non-domestic animals—in districts that are not zoned for agricultural use. But at least one council member, Rosemary Piekarski Krech, believes the city should ease its regulations to permit backyard chicken coops. On Monday, the council directed city staff to create a formal draft of the proposed ordinance, which will likely return to the council for approval later this year.

During the work session, Councilor Bill Klein strongly opposed the proposed ordinance, saying the smell and noise of a chicken coop in residential neighborhoods would create a public nuisance and lead to an enforcement headache for the city. Chicken coops, he added, may draw other predators, like foxes and coyotes, deeper into the city, causing more problems for homeowners.

“If you want chickens, move to a rural area,” Klein said. “There’s nothing that’s going to move me to vote for it.”

But Piekarski Krech, who lives in an agricultural area and raises her own flock of chickens, believes that, with the advent of the sustainable food movement and the desire to eat locally, more and more people are interested in urban chickens.

“With two or three hens, you can supply your whole family with eggs,” Piekarski Krech said. “I think it’s what people are doing, and it makes sense to me.”

If the ordinance is crafted correctly, Piekarski Krech added, the potential for a public nuisance would be minimized.

Any ordinance permitting chickens in a residential area should prohibit roosters—which produce a lot of noise—limit the number of chickens a resident can raise and require a minimum setback distance from other properties, City Planner Allan Hunting wrote in a memo provided to the council.

If the city were to draft an ordinance, Hunting added, it should require residents to confine their chickens in a coop at all times, allow coops only in the back yard of homes and require owners to apply for some kind of city-issued permit.

Other local cities that have urban chicken ordinances, including West St. Paul and Rosemount, have similar restrictions, Hunting observed. West St. Paul, for instance, only allows a resident in an urban area to own a maximum of two chickens without a special permit. Chicken coops must be located at least 100 feet from any adjacent residence, according to West St. Paul’s code.

Rosemount, for its part, allows a maximum number of three chickens and requires that coops be built at least 50 feet from a residence and 10 feet from a property line.

Because the city’s resources are limited, enforcement of such an ordinance could be problematic, City Administrator Joe Lynch told the council on Monday.

“We just don’t have the staffing, we don’t have the resources to deal with a lot of enforcement,” Lynch said.

Related Topics: City Council and Urban chickens
Should Inver Grove Heights community members be allowed to raise chickens in residential neighborhoods? Tell us in the comments.

J

10:50 am on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Oh great. Thats all this city needs is chicken coops in backyards. From experience, I know that chickens attract vermin, carry certain diseases and are noisy. Please, no chickens or other farm animals in residential areas in IGH. Pretty soon people will want to raise their own Turkeys, and Peacocks, Guinea hens and such. Nothing wrong with the way it is right now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Terry Pearson

11:05 pm on Sunday, October 2, 2011

Some people attract vermin, carry diseases, and are noisy :-)

Joking aside, keeping chickens in a coop and allowing a small number (like up to three) would eliminate the problems you point out.

Ron McClellan

2:10 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

J . . .what experience? Clearly, you don't really have much or you wouldn't have mentioned the myths you listed. Chickens don't attract vermin. Poor keeping practices do. Kinda like people who don't dispose of their trash properly. Or feed a cat or dog outside, etc. ALL of which are FAR more likely to attract vermin that Keeping chickens. Chickens do carry certain diseases . . .as do virtually ALL critters. Luckily, Chickens are the LEAST of our worries. Know what dogs and cats can vive us? Rabies, for starters. Cats carry FAR more disease that should be of concern to the average homeowner that Poultry. As for Noise . . .how about those barking dogs? Many, even most are louder than roosters, Do it far more often, and will do it all night long. Not so with roosters. That's from "actual" experience, not "pretend" experience, by the way.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron McClellan

10:39 am on Monday, June 11, 2012

Terry,
I liked your first post better, as I find restricting numbers to be arbitrary and largely unnecessary. Three is still unreasonably restrictive, and as you pointed out earlier Americans are more and more forgetting what "Liberty" even IS as they surrender it at the drop of a hat for any reason, real or more problematically imagined . . . . As evidenced by 'J's' assertions.

As I always point out to folks, virtually every potential "chicken problem" can be dealt with via most cities general nuisance and health codes. If someone starts creating a health risk, it can generally be handled with the same code one would use against someone piling their garbage on the back porch. Noise? Same code that would allow a municipality to deal with loud music, barking dogs (FAR noisier than roosters) etc. The "best regulation is "no regulation" specifically discriminating against chickens. Anything else is . . .well . . .silly. One has to be pretty anal retentive to feel like chickens are something to be scared of or worry about.

Comment_arrow

Terry Pearson

3:00 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Ron,

I completely agree. There is no reason to restrict numbers as that is what nuisance laws are for. (My restriction comment was just my attempt at getting somewhere with the issue, but in reality there is no need for number restrictions).

By the way... I like your sentence... "The best regulation is no regulation..." We do not need more laws on the books. In fact, the city should adopt a law stating that city code sunsets (ceases to exist) if not reapproved after ten years. That way, unneccesary laws like this one could be removed eventually painlessly with time.

Ron McClellan

2:12 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

There are HUNDREDS of Cites that allow keeping of backyard poultry. All these cities also have dogs and cats. Including mine. Ask our Animal Control officer to relate some "dog and cat problem" stories to you, and it would keep him telling stories for hours. Ask him about poultry problems, and you'll likely get a blank stare and a "What?" The "Animal Control Department overload myth" is SO, SO, SO weak.

Reply

Tom

2:46 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Councilor Klein is kidding himself if he thinks that chickens in residential areas will lead to an increase of the fox/coyote population in residential areas - they are already there. This is just a knee-jerk reaction to essentially a non-issue.

I challenge Mr Klein, as well as other councilmembers, to visit homes of urban chicken owners to educate themselves on the mis-perception of noise and odor.

Also, as a politician, a statement as final as "There’s nothing that’s going to move me to vote for it.” should give his constituants pause. To not even be open to considering opposing viewpoints is not the sign of a good or effective leader.

Reply

Ron McClellan

2:57 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Councilman Klein definitely exposed himself as a wannabe dictator, whose primary regret is likely that he isn't King of the City and has to tolerate us mere serfs and the rest of his council. Folks need to remember this when he's up for re-election. No doubt this propensity has reared it's ugly head on other issues too. All it takes are two or three people to make sure that everyone in the community knows about every instance when Mr. Klein exposed his totalitarian tendencies. Telling folks "move" is simply out of line. Mr. Klien needs a good "booing" or three.

Reply

J

5:19 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Mr. Klein is right, residential areas are not the place for raising poultry, at least he has some common sense. When some homeowner ends up with a rooster that they bought unknowing of its sex as a chick, and it starts its crowing at sunrise, and the neighbors start complaining, theres one problem. They won't want to get rid of it b/c now it is a 'pet' Trust me, they will arract vermin, cats, rats etc. You wonder how Ii know, my 'experience'? I raised quail as a kid for dog trainers. Every cat around knew of them, I also trapped the rats that eventually showed up. I think I had about 10 quail at a time. There were no other animals on the farm, we were grain farmers. Their droppings are about 1/10 the size of a chickens. I had about 10 pounds of food in a sealed container. I cleaned up after them as best I could. Overwintering quail was hard work and chickens in a coup won't be much better. I guarantee it, you're going to have issues you haven't thought of. Even a small number of chickens will be a PITA for the neighbors, almost as bad as a noisy dog. One thing taht would be fun to see are the Hawks that would try to grab 'em. Thats fun to watch!

Reply

Ron McClellan

6:46 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Mr. Klein is NOT right. He's quite wrong actually, and grossly misinformed to boot. As for roosters crowing in the morning . . .no more disruptive . . .less so, actually, than dogs that bark incessantly . . .at all hours.

As for ":trusting you" about your opinion on chickens attracting vermin . . .NO, I won't trust you, mainly because you have no clue what you are actually talking about. I, on the other hand, do know what I'm talking about. You raised 10 quail as a kid . . . well, maybe you should have done so with higher keeping standards. Know what else attracts vermin? Oh yea, I already posted about that, and the examples above attract FAR more Vermin than a well kept coop. As for your "guarantee" of problem issues not yet thought of . . .wrong again, J. There isn't one city out there that cats and dogs aren't a FAR bigger noise problem a FAR bigger vermin attraction problem, a FAR bigger disease concern, and a FAR, FAR, FAR bigger PITA for the neighbors than chickens ever will be. Heck . . .ask my neighbor. She is fine with our chickens . . .but the neighbor across the streets dog keeps tearing up her trash. Ever had a Chicken knock over your trash cans J? Or a Chicken escape from a back yard and then run down and maul a small child? Or a chicken get in your car if you leave the window down one night and spray cat musk all over your car seats?

Reply

Ron McClellan

8:45 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

For the record J . . . ten quail would create about half half an ounce of fecal matter a day. You really believe that caused your huge rodent problem? Rats and mice are primarily granivores . . . . "What is a granivore" may ask? An animal that uses GRAIN as a primary food source. You did say you were "grain farmers" . . .But you believe it was the half ounce of poop from 10 quail that caused the problems . . . And we should "trust you" . . . just why?

Reply

J

8:24 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011

I didn't know we were talking about dogs and their problems. I am talking about poultry, Chickens. I'll admit dogs and other pets have "FAR,FAR,FAR" more issues than chickens.

IGH is a messy enough city, I just don'y want neighbors putting up nasty looking shacks, calling them chicken coops, never getting rid of them when the chickens die in the winter, and me having to look at it forever. You know the ordanances won't be enforced, and neighbors will have to put up with it. There's many ordanances that aren't enforced now, how is the city going to enforce 'chicken ordanances?

Thanks for proving my point Mr. McClellan, that chickens can be a problem, not as much as dogs, but still a problem. I thak you for that sir.

Reply

Ron McClellan

11:01 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011

Well J, I am talking about poultry too. The point being that "Dogs and cats, by pretty much any measure you care to use, have MUCH more potential to be a nuisance than backyard poultry. It really wasn't that difficult to understand, not sure how yu missed the connection.

And considering your so-called "experience" . . .I'm surprised you don't know that chickens don't just "die in the winter." As for the dirty, nasty, dead-bird-filled eternal chicken coop you create in your own mind, existing general nuisance laws that would apply to ANY unhealthy situation would "protect" you from that. The best way for the city to have chicken ordinances, is to simply have none. Many towns and cities have no ordinances at all about poultry. Feel free to name even one city where chicken enforcement issues have caused a major . . .or even minor . . .problem. Again, you conveniently ignore what I mentioned about my own city above. J . . .you're like like Chicken Little. The sky will not fall on your town if people keep chickens. As for your pretending to thank me, as if I somehow proved YOUR point . . . .Nice try, but nobody with even half a brain would buy that, heheh. Your position was weak, it was exposed as weak. Now go clean your quail pen, that half ounce of poop is gonna attract Tigers. I hear then can swim, and really, how far away is Asia? Can't be too careful!

Reply

J

2:07 pm on Thursday, September 29, 2011

I think I have made my point, and I have found that most people with 'even half a brain' agree with me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Edward

7:22 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012

J,You have found that most people with "even half a brain" agree with you. That's not a statement that I would put out for the public to see.

Comment_arrow

Ron McClellan

10:41 am on Monday, June 11, 2012

There ya go lying again J. "Most" people don't give a rats butt, one way or the other J.
It's the folks who don't even half a brain who agree with you, I assure you.

Ron McClellan

8:03 am on Friday, September 30, 2011

I have a little more time now J, so: What point did you think you made? Just curious . . .since virtually every point you raised was exposed as fallacious. Those people who agree with you? Just as wrong and misinformed as your are.

Reply

Theresa

6:52 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Ok- Thanks- I will. God bless and have a great day!

Reply

Ron McClellan

7:56 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012

One thing you have to be careful of when calling city hall to ask if it's okay to have chickens . . .or any other potential legal issue for that matter, it them giving you bad information. And it happens all the time. My own City, West Point Ga. When I called to ask about it told me that I was not allowed to have chickens within city limits.
Having already learned from dealing with other issues, I asked them for the specific statute that prohibited them. Turns out there wasn't one. I've pointed this out to a few people on other poultry boards, and sure enough, I wasn't alone in this experience. ALWAYS ask for specific statutes. Sometimes they're non-existent, as was the case with me, or exclude only roosters, not hens, and the clerk interprets it wrong, stuff like that. And always visually verify the Ordinance yourself. Further, it can help to look over the entire code of ordinances for your city, because there may be a general prohibition on Livestock, but elsewhere in the ordinances there may be an allowance for chickens as pets, even though they may be also listed as "livestock" in another prohibitive ordinance. Good luck!

Reply

Tracy Teuber

3:53 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012

It is not the animals at fault when they become a nuisance, it is always the animals keeper. The dog barking in the yard all day or knocking over your garbage cans is not a bad dog, it's the neglectful owner. It's not that cat that by instinct kills the birds in your yard it's the owner who let him out (where he could be picked up by a bird of prey or hit by a car or maimed by the bad dog owners dog) It is not animals that create problems it is people. What you fail to understand is the person who wants to be a pig and raise chickens in a dirty, irresponsible manner is going to do it your law be damned. I am sure there are already plenty of coops in the city and you just don't know it. Unlike such a person, I am a responsible hard working adult who respects my property and the rules of my city. I would like 2 chickens so I can teach my grandson many things including agriculture, self sufficiency, animal care and responsibilty along with getting my own fresh eggs everyday. One should be able to do this without living in timbucktoo. I pay my taxes and as long as I am a good person I should be allowed to do what I want on my property as long as it doesn't hurt anybody else and I should be able to do so without fear of breaking a law.

Reply

wayne

6:26 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012

My back yard is 36'x60'. I would like to raise two milking goats, some egg laying hens and a couple of pigs for the pork. Does anyone know how many of each I am allowed to have?

Reply

Ron McClellan

9:33 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Sounds like you need a bigger lot, really. That many of those types of critters could become a nuisance pretty quickly if ya live in a residential area, unless your keeping plan is very disciplined and well thought-out. Was that a bait question?

Reply

Jim Edward

7:22 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

This subject of wanting to keep chickens with-in the city limits seems like it is causing quite a stir. I can't understand why the council hasn't followed it's usual format and hired a consulting firm for $40,000.00 or so to do a 6 month study on the impact to the city.

Reply

Paul Tuschy

11:14 am on Monday, March 26, 2012

Chicken excrement is not nearly as foul as dog and cat excrement. As a matter of fact, chicken poop can be quite beneficial to citizens’ gardens. Chicken poop is compostable, unlike dog and cat poop.
Also, chickens are not noisy at all, (as Terry said IGH could allow for no roosters and just a few hens). Hens are very quiet almost all the time. When they do squawk, the sound is not nearly as loud as a dog barking.
Dogs are louder than chickens and leave their excrement all over our city, but no one would think of banning dogs in IGH. It is completely illogical and ridiculously inconsistent for anyone oppose allowing a few chickens yet not call for a ban on all dogs in our city.

Reply

Paul Tuschy

11:33 am on Monday, March 26, 2012

And Joe Lynch is worried about not having the staffing to enforce an ordinance allowing chickens? LOLOL. How then do we have adequate staffing to enforce our current “No chickens” policy?!? Use a little bit of logic for a second Joe! How do we currently police thousands of households in IGH to make sure that no one keeps a chicken? Do we currently have a chicken czar on the city payroll to go around searching every backyard in the city to make sure there are no chickens within city limits? What if I were to get a chicken right now? According to Joe Lynch the city apparently doesn’t have enough resources to enforce city ordinances regarding chickens, so I guess I would be in the clear.

Reply

Ron McClellan

12:54 pm on Monday, March 26, 2012

One headline that has never been seen and never will:

"Town forced into bankruptcy trying to enforce Chicken Laws"

Reply

Angela

5:03 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012

I want chickens!!!
This above statement is written by my 9 year old daughter who would like to learn about animals and she believes it would be very useful and tasty to have fresh eggs just outside her door. In a world where children are less and less exposed each day to our natural world I believe that urban chickens should be allowed. Has the council made any progress on this issue?

Reply

Jason P

10:04 pm on Sunday, June 10, 2012

Our neighbor (in a residential area of IGH) has hens and roosters. I can tell you from experience, the roosters are noisy and MEAN! They do not stay in the neighbors yard and chase us and our dog when they come into our yard. I would not be sad if they weren't around anymore.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Edward

5:07 am on Monday, June 11, 2012

If the neighbors chickens chased me or my dog in my own yard, they would end up in my freezer. Yum, Yum.

Ron McClellan

10:49 am on Monday, June 11, 2012

Jim,
Your dog has never ended up in a neighbors yard? Even accidentally? Would you really want me shooting your dog for something as benign as incidental trespass?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Edward

2:44 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

If my dog came into your yard and chased you, I would expect you to shoot it. Either that or call the Dog Catcher. If my chickens come into your yard and chase you, I would expect you to shoot them or call the Chicken Catcher.

Dody Sobaszkiewicz

1:46 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012

What I would like to know is if they city is going to do anything regarding passing an ordinance. I am all for raising chickens in a residential area, I have done it and my coop and chickens are very clean and well cared for.

Reply

rake

3:12 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012

I thought dogs are suppose to be kept on a leash or fenced in? Neighbors dogs bark all day and all night. Sick of bad pet owners!

Reply

Leave a comment