patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Mitt Romney Protesters Rally at Lake Minnetonka's Lafayette Club

With chants, masks and signs, protesters made their presence felt during the Republican frontrunner's visit to Minnesota.

 
0 of 0
St. Louis Park resident Ilo Madden joins protesters outside of the Lafayette Club in Lake Minnetonka as the crowd awaits Mitt Romney's arrival to the area. Lisa Baumann
Photos (11)

Photos

St. Louis Park resident Ilo Madden joins protesters outside of the Lafayette Club in Lake Minnetonka as the crowd awaits Mitt Romney's arrival to the area.
Images of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, the presumed GOP Presidential ticket, were on hand at the protest.
Protestors at the reception for presidential candidate Mitt Romney at the Lafayette Club on Lake Minnetonka on Thursday, Aug. 23.
Pam Mikkelson of Prior Lake spoke at the protest. As a school secretary, she's worried about more cuts to education if Romney is elected. "Mitt chooses fat cats over teachers," she said.

As presumed Republican nominee Mitt Romney prepared to descend on the Lake Minnetonka area Thursday evening, an estimated 50 to 75 protesters began to assemble at one of the prime spots for his visit, Lake Minnetonka's prestigious Lafayette Club.

With Vice Presidential candidate Paul Ryan still a questionable arrival, demonstrators made sure his presence was known with cardboard masks.

St. Louis Park resident Ilo Madden attended the protest rally because she's "worried about democracy." She said she's saved $300 so far under the new health care plan.

"I love 'Obamacare.' I don't like Bush tax cuts," she said. Her personal slogan, she said, is "keep your 'mitts' off my healthcare."

Most of the people in expensive vehicles driving by protestors on their way into the country club continued undeterred. A few drivers honked horns in support and one man gave a friendly wave. One woman riding in a Cadillac, however, stuck her tongue out at the crowd.

Romney was visiting Minnesota to raise funds and those attending the private reception at the country club reportedly paid $2,500 each and up to $10,000 for a photo. An MPR report said that it would be the only event Romney attends in Minnesota this election season and that a $50,000 donation secured an invite to a private dinner afterwards at a home in Shorewood.

While protestors and others waited for the motorcade, a few people on bicycles stopped because they said they couldn't believe the size of the crowd.

They crossed the street and began yelling at the protestors.

When protestors yelled, "minimum wage is poverty, we demand our dignity," Robin Mackell of Mound countered with "minimum wage is too high!"

"To be bused in is so contrived and ridiculous," she said of the protest, which was officially coined The Rally to Reject the Romney Economy and organized by Americans for Tax Fairness, MoveOn.org, TakeAction Minnesota, SEIU and Minnesotans for a Fair Economy. 

"They want tax breaks for the richest 2 percent, added Spring Park resident John Bradley. "But we're paying all the taxes."

Not all of the protestors were President Obama supporters. Lee Leichentritt of St. Paul said he's against the two-party political system "that's ruining our country."

"No more two-party dance," he added.

Leichentritt said he plans to vote for Green Party Presidential Candidate Jill Stein. 

Romney's motorcade arrived at the club just before 7 p.m., nearly an hour late, and once all the vehicles had driven past the crowd, it quickly dispersed.

Romney's scheduled visit to Lake Minnetonka comes less than week before the Republican National Convention in Florida, where he is expected to officially secure the party's nomination for president.

Vice President Joe Biden visited Minneapolis Tuesday and gave a speech to about 1,500 people at a campaign rally.

Romney's last visit to Minnesota came back in early February, when he was glitter bombed twice by protestors during a rally in Eagan.

The 2012 election takes place Nov. 6.

Related Topics: Elections, Lafayette Club, Lake Minnetonka, Mitt Romney, Presidential Election 2012, and elections 2012

DIY in Orono

6:54 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Ilo should be thanking those at the Lafayette Club for her $300 savings, because they most certainly are paying for it! Classic maker vs taker........

Reply

Mark Hugo

7:43 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Imature children. Whine whine whine...

Be glad this isn't Syria.

Max Hugoson

Reply

Freedom

7:50 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Sure glad I'm not form Prior Lake and have Pam Mikkelson for my children's school secretary. Thank God for the private sector that pays her salary.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Kevira Voegele

10:00 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

I deleted comments that violated our terms of use (a link is at the bottom of the page). We will not tolerate personal attacks or threats of any kind. Go ahead and state your opinion, but don't go beyond that.

Patch_comments_icon

Mike Schoemer

8:07 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

First time for a public protest at the Lafayette?

Reply
Comment_arrow

DIY in Orono

8:15 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Doubt it, it's over 100 years old, started by JJ Hill.

Comment_arrow

Al Anderson

11:01 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Honestly, Mike -- what difference does it make what vehicle the people who were in the area and drove past the protesters drove? Your bias is so clear for others to see. Did you also note the size of the guaranteed pensions that the union workers get from the people driving by in those vehicles?

Gary Doan

10:40 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Typical Team Obama, they bus in any radicals they can find to protest what, someone/anyone running against Obama? This is only a small piece of Team Obama's strategy to distract voters from the important issues. Obama has said Jobs are his top priority how many times? If he was telling the truth and they have been his top priority, he has failed miserably.

Reply

Joe American

10:45 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Can't beleave it. 150 idiots at a country club make the news and 5,000 tax protesters at the capital never any attention. I hope you get the new America you deserve.

Reply

ghoweey

6:52 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

All above comment writers are true patriots. God bless them alll!!!!!!!

Reply

Nancy LaRoche

6:59 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

I looked at the MoveOn.org signs and a recent email from SEIU offering bus ride to protesters. "Transportation will be available at SEIU Healthcare Minnesota located at 345 Randolph Street in St. Paul. Please call (612) 564-3247 to RSVP your spot and be at there around 4. Bus will leave at 4:30pm and should return around 7:30pm."

This is astroturf protesting at its worst. Fail.

Reply

Ann Knutson

7:47 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

Why do you always dwell on the negative when it comes to Republican candidates? There were many more supporters of Romney there than protesters. I wish that people would wake up regarding Obama's "agenda" for our country. Another four years of his administration and we won't have anything much left of our great country.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Pat Rodriguez

9:22 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

We comment on the negatives because there are no positives!

Comment_arrow

Cy

12:32 pm on Friday, August 24, 2012

Let us not forget that the crisis started under the Bush administration due to the lack of regulations on financial institutions (subprime mortgages) which played a major role in the meltdown of our economy. Going to take some time for the mess to get turned around.

Comment_arrow

Ted128

8:11 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Cy - it may have been the Bush Era Administration during the housing crisis, but don't forget that it was democrats like Barney Frank who led the charge with "Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are sound, there is no risk". This was a bi-partisan failure. And who got bailed out? The banks. The banks got us in this problem, the banks got bailed out so they would loosen up their credit and get the economy moving and how did the banks respond? Tightened their fat, greedy fists around the wad of cash the people gave them and made getting credit even harder. Should've bailed out the people, not the banks.

B. Martin

8:08 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

These are good examples of the direction the country is headed. None of these comments have any relevance to the conversation. No constructive criticism, just insults. No positive elaboration of a position or policy, just cliched comments. What a waste.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Al Anderson

8:31 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

Says the kettle to the pot. While I agree that discussing the issues is important - the issue of avoiding the issues is done on both sides of the aisle. Obama's campaign is much more one of issue avoidance and unconstructive criticism.

As for the Patch -- they initiate this sort of conversation when they write biased garbage like the two Romney stories. Funny how the local mdia ALWAYS has time to focus on the shipped in protesters -- but not focus on the issues? Why didn't you ask that quesion

Robbie Lewis

8:39 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

This is the appropriate venue for opinions, not the article itself. I would like to read at least an attempt at more balanced reporting on the part of the Patch.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Kevira Voegele

9:14 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

A comment was removed for a violation of our terms of use.

Bauer

8:48 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

Down with the two party system. It's time for America to wake up.

Reply

Capital Ism

8:58 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

That's the left there boys - what a classy looking bunch.. Now that I got my good laugh for the morning, I should get back to work.

Reply

Joshua

10:14 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

1) Of *course* the candidates will campaign where the money is (e.g. Minnetonka)
2) Protesting does not constitute radicalism
3) If you disagree with the protestors, may I remind you that the freedom of assembly is a right that is guaranteed in the First Amendment
4) For those that cannot distinguish the differences between peaceful assemblers and radical protesters, please Google the Westboro Baptist Church for comparison and contrast

You can anonymously troll on the internet from (almost) anywhere in the world. The United States, however, is one of the few places where you have the protected right to protest.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cy

12:06 pm on Friday, August 24, 2012

Yes, I agree. Free to come together and collectively express, promote, pursue and defend common interests. (Wow, what a radical idea...)

David

1:46 pm on Friday, August 24, 2012

Cy let me help you understand when and where the crisis really began, please take the time to read, I had to break it into two parts since it is long long.

This tells the story, why Bush was so bad at the end of his term. Don’t just skim over this, it’s not very long, read it slowly and let it sink in. If in doubt, check it out!!!The day the democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009, it was actually January 3rd 2007 the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110thCongress.The Democrat Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this: January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress. At the time: The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%The Unemployment rate was 4.6%George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB GROWTH

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cy

10:40 pm on Sunday, August 26, 2012

Thanks, I did check it out
The Wall Street Journal: "The Bush administration created about three million jobs (net) over its eight years, a fraction of the 23 million jobs created under President Bill Clinton's administration."
The Washington Post:George W. Bush presided over the worst eight-year economic performance in the modern American presidency
New York Times on January 24 "Economic Setbacks That Define the Bush Years." George W. Bush, the first MBA president, was a historic failure when it came to expanding GDP, producing jobs and fueling stock market growth.
After the release of the Census Bureau report ("Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2008" The Atlantic wrote "Closing The Book On The Bush Legacy"...
On every major measurement, the Census Bureau report shows that the country lost ground during Bush's two terms. While Bush was in office, the median household income declined, poverty increased, childhood poverty increased even more, and the number of Americans without health insurance spiked. By contrast, the country's condition improved on each of those measures during Bill Clinton's two terms, often substantially.

Comment_arrow

Joshua

9:18 am on Monday, August 27, 2012

David, what is your source for this? Or are you just making it up?

David

1:52 pm on Friday, August 24, 2012

Remember the day...January 3rd, 2007was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee. The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy? BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES! Unemployment... to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES! Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie- starting in2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy. And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie? OBAMA and the Democrat Congress. So when someone tries to blame Bush..REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007.... THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!"Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democrat Party.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cy

2:42 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012

The big money Republicans and Democrats both deregulated the banking industry in the 80s and 90s. It went off the rails. Bankers loosened credit and got the entire nation into massive debt. Ran up the prices of housing, let banks make up risky investments to supposedly cover their losses... a total pyramid scam with the all of us in the middle of it.... Bush was doing this crap for 8 years.

The tailspin into an economic death spiral occurred DURING the Bush administration in the fall of 2007 when Wall Street crashed and burned. The stage was set years before that. They tossed Bush out and the Democrats came in to the biggest mess in history...

Obama, fearing total crash and 50% unemployment continued the bank bail out policy and kept Bush's people more or less running the banking system and the Federal Reserve.
My guess is Obama avoided a total catastrophe and saved millions of jobs but he didn't do enough. However to say that Obama was responsible for Lehman Brothers and Merril Lynch evaporating and wall street crashing in 2007 is ridiculous.

Comment_arrow

penny

11:21 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Extremely good and right on.

David

1:53 pm on Friday, August 24, 2012

Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 &2009 as well as 2010 &2011.In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases. For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budgets. (We might add … the last time the Senate authorized a Budget to be passed!) …Almost 1,100 days and counting ….And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009.If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets. If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself. In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January20th, 2009.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DIY in Orono

10:45 pm on Friday, August 24, 2012

BRILLIANT, thank you David! You are 100% right on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Amie Garretson

11:59 pm on Friday, August 24, 2012

The author of this article really ought to be more careful with keeping his bias out of his reporting. That is his responsibility as a journalist when writing for the public- at- large. Ignoring this responsibility and choosing to typecast has left many readers focused on the insinuated insult, therefore feeling ignored by this news source, The Patch, and ultimately fanning the flames of political "Us versus Them". The author of this article owes the offended audience of The Patch an apology for the inclusion of negative typecasting in his reporting.

Reply

Mark

7:36 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012

Wow. Poor John Bradley of Spring Park. He is quoted in the article as a self described "98% er" and complains that his demographic is "paying all the taxes". How do you educate a person that has it exactly backwards? The IRS data is public information and posted on any number of websites. It clearly states that the top 3% of income earners pay 97% of all income taxes. His assumption is not just wrong, it is spectacularly, perfectly, and precisely backwards. Not to pour more fuel on his self immolation party, but the bottom 50% pay no income tax. How do we overcome the ignorance of people like John? I fear they just won't realize how wrong their world assumptions are until we default on our national debt or suffer 100%+ inflation. But that's going to be one painful way to finally realize who has been telling the truth and who has been lying to them for all these years.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Lisa Baumann

8:55 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012

Hey Mark, I re-read that quote, which I wrote after speaking with John and now realize he probably meant to say "they want tax hikes for the richest 2 percent, but we're paying all the taxes," because he was not a protestor, he was one who stopped to yell back at them. Sorry for the confusion.

Reply

TaterSalad

6:23 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

#1 in the box office and yet the liberal press doesn't mention this documentary that Barack Obama does not want you to watch. I wonder why?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2012/09/01/Box-Office-Spet-1-2012

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anon

8:29 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

TaterSalad - Did you actually read your own link? Not even remotely near #1, either as a general movie or as a political movie. Although the Republicans appear to be trying, lies will not win this election.

TaterSalad

9:02 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Liberal moonbats are so clueless on what Barack Obama is doing that they will lite candles before bedtime and kiss his faded poster on the wall.

http://weaselzippers.us/2012/09/01/poll-number-of-americans-who-consider-themselves-republicans-hits-record-high/

Reply
Comment_arrow

penny

11:24 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Hey Anon did you see the movie before your comments?

Michele

9:49 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

It's amazing to me how people get angry over the actions of peaceful protesters - OR the participants of a peaceful convention - when there are so many people out there not bothering to lift their heads out of the latest reality show. I celebrate all of those trying to make a difference. (Me, the liberal.)

Reply

Marissa Partridge

12:19 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

There is another way. The moderate way. Of course, this means no extreme right views and no extreme left views. Balanced, common sense.

http://www.lp.org/platform

Reply
Comment_arrow

rob_h78

8:40 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

"Industries should be governed by free markets."

Does the Party favor getting rid of Trademarks, Patents and Copyrights and forcing companies to compete in a real free market? Or does the Party favor keeping those big government protections to help shield companies and people from having to compete in a real free market?

Leave a comment