Sen. John Marty: "Now Is The Time To Stand Up To The NRA"

In the wake of the Sandy Hook school massacre, the Roseville state senator says it's time to re-examine gun laws, including considering the licensing of gun owners.

With the Minnesota Legislature set next Tuesday to convene its 2013 session, Roseville state Sen. John Marty has a number of issues on his agenda.

One issue, with national implications, is the re-emerging conversation and debate is whether there is a need for new gun control laws.
Marty penned the following column for the Apple Pie Alliance and has shared it with Roseville Patch

"The tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary in mid-December prompted national soul-searching about what can be done to stop these mass shootings.

Some have called for security changes in schools; some have called for a reduction in the violence in movies and video games; some have called for strengthening our mental health system; and some have called for gun laws with teeth. Not surprisingly, the NRA has called for more guns in schools.

Most of these ideas could have an impact:
- I was an author of a Minnesota law requiring lock-down drills to improve security in schools.
- Although it is not something government can do, I believe it is important that each of us as individuals, as parents, or as peers, challenge the idea that watching violence, or "virtually" practicing the killing of others, is "entertainment."
- And, we would see huge reductions in violent crime if we ensured that all people, including those most troubled by mental illness or chemical dependency, receive the care they need when they need it.

To make this happen, we need more than rhetoric: we need to pass the proposed Minnesota Health Plan or an alternative that truly delivers comprehensive care for everyone.

Time for comprehensive look at gun laws

But in addition to these reforms, it is also time to take a comprehensive look at our gun laws.

Practically anyone can purchase an arsenal of weaponry powerful enough to gun down dozens of victims in minutes. Even people who have committed violent acts and even those with serious mental illness are able to purchase assault weapons and large capacity ammunition clips.

The NRA's allies argue that if Adam Lanza, the gunman in Newtown, knew that teachers and other adults were carrying guns in the school, he would have been scared away from entering the school and murdering children. But Mr. Lanza wasn't afraid of getting killed; he intended to die in his shooting rampage and committed suicide.

The idea that numerous armed teachers in every school might reduce the carnage as they engage in gun battles with intruders is preposterous. More loaded guns in classrooms would result in accidental shootings, and perhaps even intentional ones, when an angry student uses a gun found in a teacher's purse or desk drawer.

The NRA's call for the federal government to spend several billion dollars a year to pay for one or more armed police officers at every school in the country would be one of the most expensive, ill-conceived solutions possible. The gunmen at Columbine or Sandy Hook or other schools often orchestrate their attacks carefully and could easily plan to kill at times or places in the school where the officer is not around. Besides, most of these killers have far greater firepower than the school police officers would have.

It is a hopeful sign that we are seeing the beginning of a national conversation about our gun laws. The gun lobby has so much political clout that few politicians have challenged them, and discussion of gun laws has been cut short. When Minnesota passed the concealed carry law several years ago, the pro-gun lobby defeated an amendment that would have denied gun permits to applicants who have a restraining order against them.

In effect, the gun lobby persuaded legislators that even if an abuse victim obtains an order for protection, that's not enough reason to deny the abuser the right to carry a gun!

Reinstating the federal assault weapons ban would be a step forward. But for a more comprehensive look at how we should regulate guns, let's consider how we regulate cars. There are lawful uses for both guns and cars, but both are deadly when misused.

With cars, we require the operator to be trained and licensed. We register the vehicle, and re-register it when transferring to a new owner.

But for guns, there is no licensing, no training requirement, and no registration. This enables criminals to obtain guns from a private citizen with no background check, no waiting period - no means of enforcement at all.

We don't have a gun registration system because the gun lobby has used fear tactics to fight even modest regulation. They say, "First they'll register your guns, then the next thing they'll do is take 'em away." Sure. Just like they did with cars...

Actually, the government does take away cars, but only from people using them illegally. In Minnesota, the courts can seize the cars of drug dealers and repeat DWI offenders. It is not a radical thought to question whether we should do the same for criminals with guns. What part of well-regulated militia don't they understand?

Here are some reasonable changes that are long overdue:

  • Licensing gun owners and registering firearms.
  • Extending waiting periods and criminal background checks for private gun sales.
  • Putting a lifetime ban on gun ownership for people convicted of violent crimes.
  • Reinstating the federal ban on assault weapons and large ammunition clips.

What do you think of Marty's ideas? Share your thoughts in the comments below.


These modest proposals do not punish responsible gun owners any more than vehicle registration punishes responsible car owners. But these proposals will help stop the arms race on our streets where deranged killers and gang members are more heavily armed than the police.

Despite public support for gun control, the gun lobby continues to fight common-sense reforms. It is well-organized and intimidating. Lawmakers raising this issue are accustomed to nasty phone calls.

The NRA works to discredit these proposals, and those who offer them. I am a moderate on gun control, yet I have received "F-" ratings on the NRA report card, because I seek responsible gun laws.

Perhaps because most of the victims were young children, there has been a perceptible shift in momentum on the issue since the Sandy Hook school shootings. Now is the time for public officials to stand up to the NRA, and have a rational discussion over public safety and responsible gun laws."

For Roseville news and information, _subscribe to our free newsletter. Also, like us on Facebook and follow us _on Twitter_

Chuck S. January 04, 2013 at 04:15 PM
It is the easy way out to call for additional gun law legislation, but the guns are not being misused by themselves. In each and every case of a horrific mass murder involving a gun, the indivdual responsable was unstable. Many, I believe, looking for suicide by cop, and in the process, causing untold grief to others. Had these indviduals been identified and treated or confined for treatment, I doubt we would be having this conversation. People bent on destruction will find a way to do harm. Timothy McVay comes to mind. And if we do nothing to identify and list people, who ,already by law, are banned from gun ownership, in a national data base, listing them as mentally unstable, so a backround check will stop a gun purchase,, Adding more gun laws will do little to stop those causing the carnage. I suggest Sen. Marty work on that aspect of social change, helping the mentally ill, rather than focus on adding more gun laws or leglizing same sex unions. In the long run, that will save more lives, although it garners smaller headlines.
B. Martin January 05, 2013 at 01:18 AM
Stand up to the NRA? Just ignore them as you would any group with an uncompromising agenda.
Andy Jenn January 06, 2013 at 05:47 PM
The faint example of registering car to make the use of the cars safer or easer to follow their use is a good example of emotion shifting. Registration never stop a car from being stolen by bad guys. Registration never stoped cars from being used in a crime. Registration never made a car safer to operate, even with the proper licesence. Registration does cost money each year. Registration does involve the government to allow its use. Registration does case the insurance companies to play a roll
Alexander Novak February 17, 2013 at 11:54 AM
Hey No Guns. We need our guns to protect us from the government you elected. An armed citizen is a free citizen. We need fewer John Martys to tell us how to where to and when to live.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »